Effects of Instructional Materials on Literacy Levels of Learners among Primary Schools in Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Instructional materials, which include a wide range of tools and resources used by teachers to facilitate learning and encourage the learning process, play a crucial role in the educational landscape. This study aimed to investigate the effects of instructional materials on literacy levels of learners among primary schools in Sydney, Australia. Learner-centered instructional materials promote meaningful learning and enhance the enjoyment of the learning experience. In the current era, primary school entry ages make it highly suitable to employ instructional materials. Literacy, defined as the ability to read, write, talk, and listen in a manner that enables people to communicate effectively and make sense of the world around them, is highly valued in Australia. The study employed a descriptive research design, with a target population of 50 primary schools in the Sydney metropolitan area. A sample of 20 primary schools was selected using stratified and random sampling techniques, and a total of 200 participants, including teachers and students, were chosen using purposive sampling. Data were collected using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings of the study revealed that instructional materials have a significant impact on the literacy levels of learners. The quality and relevance of instructional materials can influence learners' comprehension, retention of information, and ultimately, their ability to read, write, and communicate effectively. Effective instructional materials should be designed with the learner's needs in mind, considering factors such as age, reading level, cultural background, and learning style. The study recommends that the government allocate sufficient funds to increase the number and variety of instructional materials available in primary schools. Additionally, the establishment of resource centers is suggested to facilitate the borrowing and sharing of teaching materials that may not be readily available in individual primary schools. These measures can contribute to the creation of a supportive and resource-rich learning environment that promotes literacy development among primary school learners in Sydney, Australia.
Keywords: Instructional Materials, Literacy Levels, Learners, Primary Schools, Sydney, Australia
References
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., & Kim, N. J. (2017). A Bayesian network meta-analysis to synthesize the influence of contexts of scaffolding use on cognitive outcomes in STEM education. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1042-1081.
Brown, W. (2020). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.
Cahyani, N. L. P., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2021). Digital Literacy-Based Learning Video on the Topic of Natural Resources and Technology for Grade IV Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(3), 538-548.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five strategies for optimizing instructional materials: Instructor-and learner-managed cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1379-1407.
Dumpang, C. N., Sedanza, M. A. C., & Caluza, L. (2021). Needs assessment of grade 8 instructional materials in teaching Filipino: A phenomenology. International Journal of Research Publications, 71(1), 13.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2021). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. ASCD.
Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 479-501.
Govender, R., & Hugo, A. J. (2020). An analysis of the results of literacy assessments conducted in South African primary schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1-13.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445.
Gupta, A., & Pathania, P. (2021). To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 843-857.
Gutierrez, A., Lowe, K., & Guenther, J. (2021). Indigenous student literacy outcomes in Australia: A systematic review of literacy programmes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(1), 37-60.
Hungi, N., Njagi, J., Wekulo, P., & Ngware, M. (2018). Effects of language of instruction on learning of literacy skills among pre-primary school children from low-income urban communities in Kenya. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 187-199.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2018). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 319-346). Routledge.
Lin, S., Williamson, F., Beetson, J., Bartlett, B., Boughton, B., & Taylor, R. (2021). Quantifying low English literacy in Australian Aboriginal communities: a correlational study. The Australian educational researcher, 48(2), 267-280.
Malunga, A. (2020). The Contribution of Teaching And Learning Materials To The Learning Of Literacy In Selected Primary Schools Of Lusaka District. Zambia https://www. researchgate. net/publication/346397847.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 41, 31-48.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mupa, P., & Chinooneka, T. I. (2015). Factors Contributing to Ineffective Teaching and Learning in Primary Schools: Why Are Schools in Decadence? Journal of education and practice, 6(19), 125-132.
Naidoo, U., Reddy, K., & Dorasamy, N. (2014). Reading literacy in primary schools in South Africa: Educator perspectives on factors affecting reading literacy and strategies for improvement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 155-167.
Nguyen, T. T., Le, X. T. T., Nguyen, N. T. T., Nguyen, Q. N., Le, H. T., Pham, Q. T., ... & Ho, R. C. (2021). Psychosocial impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers during the nationwide partial lockdown in Vietnam in April 2020. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 562337.
Nnabugwu, J. O., Onwuka, L. N., & Ugwude, D. I. (2020). Availability and utilization of instructional material in the implementation of early childhood literacy curriculum in public schools in Orumba South. Journal of Early Childhood and Primary Education, 2(1), 38-48.
Oyetunde, T. O. (2016). Improving literacy instructional practices in primary schools in Nigeria: Strategies that work.
Park, J., Kang, B. S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A study on the development of curriculum content structure for information literacy education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 229-254.
Plass, Jan L., Roxana Moreno, and Roland Brünken, eds. "Cognitive load theory." (2010).
Pun, J., Thomas, N., & Bowen, N. E. J. A. (2022). Questioning the sustainability of English-medium instruction policy in science classrooms: Teachers’ and students’ experiences at a Hong Kong secondary school. Sustainability, 14(4), 2168.
Puzio, K., Colby, G. T., & Algeo-Nichols, D. (2020). Differentiated literacy instruction: Boondoggle or best practice? Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 459-498.
Rashid, M., Hassan, M. F., Danish, A., & Ahmed, A. (2020). The effect of using jute fiber on deformation resistance of asphalt concrete.
Renkl, A. (2014). Toward an instructionally oriented theory of example‐based learning. Cognitive science, 38(1), 1-37.
Suwarto, D. H., Setiawan, B., & Machmiyah, S. (2022). Developing digital literacy practices in Yogyakarta elementary schools. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(2), pp101-111.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22, 123-138.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10, 251-296.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational psychology review, 22, 271-296.
Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational psychology review, 22, 155-174.
Winarni, E. W., Hambali, D., & Purwandari, E. P. (2020). Analysis of Language and Scientific Literacy Skills for 4th Grade Elementary School Students through Discovery Learning and ICT Media. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 213-222.
Zimmerman, L., & Howie, S. J. (2016). Moving from a discourse of access to reading instructional materials to the management and utilisation thereof: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study at Grade 4 in South Africa. Mousaion, 34(2), 31-53.
