Getting Started: Organizational Structures to Promote Continuous Innovation
Abstract
83% of companies’ view innovation as a top priority, however only 3% are actually ready to translate this priority into actionable results. To enable innovation as a continual integrated enterprise process, senior leadership must first assess the organization’s current status. While this may seem complex, the paper introduces a comprehensive initial assessment methodology that enables organizations to easilyevaluate their innovation readiness across three dimensions: historical innovation performance, organizational architecture, and innovation metrics. The application of artificial intelligence may assist in the initial assessment to include detailed views of the organization’s culture, reward systems, work structures, and information systems. Recognizing that many organizations may lack fundamental innovation structures based on assessment results, the paper proposes two specific initiatives to overcome initial implementation barriers. First, incorporate innovation performance objectives into employee performance plans across all organizational levels—from individual contributors to senior executives—with clearly differentiated responsibilities. Second, institute formal innovation processes with designated process owners, key objectives, specific metrics, and communication channels, overseen by senior leadership with quarterly board reporting. By providing both assessment tools and concrete starting points, this framework offers established organizations a practical pathway to transform innovation aspirations into systematic organizational capabilities, distinguishing between incremental improvements and transformative initiatives with market-dominating potential.
Keywords: Corporate Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Organizational Structure, STAR Model for Corporate Innovation
References
Berman, R., Markette, N., Vera, R., & Gehle, T. (2024). STAR, a universal, repeatable, strategic model of corporate innovation for industry domination. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(9), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150903
Berman, R., Markette, N., Vera, R., & Gehle, T. (2025). Accelerating innovation: Integrating AI with STAR corporate innovation model. JBMI Insight, 2(1), 1-17.
Boni, A. A., & Joseph, D. (2019). Four models for corporate transformative, open innovation. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 24(4), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb911
Escobar-Sierra, M., Lara-Valencia, L., & Valencia-De-Lara, P. (2017). Model for innovation management by companies based on corporate entrepreneurship. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.21511/PPM.15(3-1).2017.07
Feng, Y. (2024). Digital transformation and organizational restructuring: assessing the impact of artificial intelligence on organizational innovation. Journal of Systems and Management Sciences, 14(2) 339-354. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2024.0221
Freeman, J., & Engel, J. S. (2007). Models of innovation: Startups and mature corporations. California Management Review, 50(1), 94-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166418
Itonics (2025). Your all-in-one innovation patform. ITONICS - The AI-Powered Innovation Operating System
Maddipudi, S. (2024). AI in SAP – SAP Transforms Joule with collaborative AI Agenda to Drive Business Innovation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences, (12) 4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14280092
Sidhu, I., Lavian, T., & Howell, V. (2015). R&D models for advanced development & corporate research: Understanding six models of advanced R&D [Conference session]. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Belfast, UK. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438653
Tidd, J. (2006). Innovation models paper 1: A review of innovation models. Imperial College, London.
Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2015). Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66-90. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66