Citizen Participation and Service Delivery in Switzerland: A Case of Healthcare Sector in Luzern Canton
Abstract
Citizen participation in Switzerland is deeply ingrained in the nation's democratic culture, where individuals actively engage in shaping policies and service delivery. The Swiss model combines direct democracy with decentralized governance, allowing citizens to influence decision-making at both the federal and local levels. This robust participation extends to various sectors, including healthcare, education, and infrastructure, leading to enhanced transparency, accountability, and tailored service delivery. Switzerland's approach to citizen participation serves as an exemplar of how active engagement can positively impact service delivery, fostering a sense of ownership and responsiveness within public institutions. The study found that citizen engagement is highly active, fostering transparency and accountability within the healthcare system. This active participation has led to more patient-centered care, with services tailored to the unique needs and preferences of the local population. However, challenges regarding the representativeness of citizen participation and the evolving role of digital technology in healthcare governance require ongoing attention to ensure inclusivity and efficiency. In conclusion, the case of Luzern Canton in Switzerland highlights the transformative impact of citizen participation on healthcare service delivery. The active involvement of citizens has resulted in a healthcare system that is more transparent, responsive, and aligned with the diverse needs of the community, serving as a compelling example of how democratic principles can enhance service delivery in the healthcare sector. It was recommended that authorities should implement targeted outreach programs to engage underrepresented communities and ensure inclusivity, while also providing digital literacy support to bridge the digital divide and maximize online participation. Establishing collaborative forums that facilitate meaningful interaction between citizens and healthcare experts can promote the balanced incorporation of community insights and specialized knowledge, contributing to more informed and effective healthcare decision-making.
Keywords: Citizen Participation, Service Delivery, Healthcare, Switzerland
References
Bonsón, E., Perea, D., & Bednárová, M. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government information quarterly, 36(3), 480-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
De Weger, E., Van Vooren, N., Luijkx, K. G., Baan, C. A., & Drewes, H. W. (2018). Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
Gagliardi, D., Schina, L., Sarcinella, M. L., Mangialardi, G., Niglia, F., & Corallo, A. (2021). Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.002
Giest, S., & Samuels, A. (2023). Administrative burden in digital public service delivery: The social infrastructure of library programs for e‐inclusion. Review of Policy Research, 40(5), 626-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12516
Hügel, S., & Davies, A. R. (2020). Public participation, engagement, and climate change adaptation: A review of the research literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11(4), e645. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.645
Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502
Leiss, W., & Larkin, P. (2019). Risk communication and public engagement in CCS projects: The foundations of public acceptability. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 22(3-4), 384-403. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2019.103339
Li, X., Zhang, F., Hui, E. C. M., & Lang, W. (2020). Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities, 102, 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102743
Matveieva, O., Navumau, V., & Gustafsson, M. (2022, August). Adoption of Public e-services versus Civic Tech Services: On the Issue of Trust and Citizen Participation in Ukraine and Belarus. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 15-30). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_2
Memeti, M., & Kalcheva, D. (2019). E-Services Tool or Burden for Local Authorities, Evidence from the Republic Of North Macedonia and Republic Of Bulgaria. ISCBE 2019, 697.
Olphert, W., & Damodaran, L. (2019). Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: The missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(9), 27. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00137
Slaev, A. D., Kovachev, A., Nozharova, B., Daskalova, D., Nikolov, P., & Petrov, P. (2019). Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Planning Theory, 18(4), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848472
Teasell, R., Salbach, N. M., Foley, N., Mountain, A., Cameron, J. I., Jong, A. D., ... & Lindsay, M. P. (2020). Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; update 2019. International Journal of Stroke, 15(7), 763-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897843
Tindana, P. O., Singh, J. A., Tracy, C. S., Upshur, R. E. G., Daar, A. S., Singer, P. A., ... & Lavery, J. V. (2020). Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries. Plos medicine, 4(9), e273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273
Waddington, H., Sonnenfeld, A., Finetti, J., Gaarder, M., John, D., & Stevenson, J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low‐and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), e1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025
